Maybe you should just give it some more time.
It worked just fine for me, especially in high register.
PT-50 Take Some Getting Used To ?
-
smurphius
- 3 valves

- Posts: 362
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:36 pm
With work, you can improve anything over time, regardless of what mouthpiece you're using. That is a huge mouthpiece (I played one for 3 years) that does take some getting used to, but eventually I learned to love it.
Think about your air flow going through the mouthpiece and try to center it. If that isn't working right, it could be causing you some of the other problems you mentioned.
You'll definately be playing with a darker, big sound with that thing, I'm sure you've noticed.
Think about your air flow going through the mouthpiece and try to center it. If that isn't working right, it could be causing you some of the other problems you mentioned.
You'll definately be playing with a darker, big sound with that thing, I'm sure you've noticed.
-
MikeMason
- 6 valves

- Posts: 2102
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:03 am
- Location: montgomery/gulf shores, Alabama
- Contact:
I think of the 50+ as a large ensemble/orchestra mp for heavy rep.I've yet to need multiple tonguing in these situations,though i do have a very fast single tongue.I use other horns and mp's if i need to multiple tongue.The 50+ and my big holton make a sound that makes me smile on heavy tunes 
Pensacola Symphony
Troy University-adjunct tuba instructor
Yamaha yfb621 with 16’’ bell,with blokepiece symphony
Eastman 6/4 with blokepiece symphony/profundo
Troy University-adjunct tuba instructor
Yamaha yfb621 with 16’’ bell,with blokepiece symphony
Eastman 6/4 with blokepiece symphony/profundo
- porkchopsisgood
- pro musician

- Posts: 243
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:55 am
-
Thomas Maurice Booth
- 3 valves

- Posts: 433
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 6:03 pm
The heavyness of the PT-50+ I found through my playing and experimenting was as said before good for some of the harder blows ie: Bruckner stuff, some Mahler, etc. However, with the regular PT-50, I got the same results in my sound but with a crisper and more consistent(in regards to clarity). Both are good mouthpieces, but I would exercise discretion as to what I use the PT-50+ for.
I post because you're unable to Google.
-
J Stowe
- bugler

- Posts: 166
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:46 am
- Location: Columbia, SC
- Contact:
-
quinterbourne
- 4 valves

- Posts: 772
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 5:52 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
I have a PT50 (not a +) and I think it's great. I tried it beside a PT50+ and found that the sound was only very slightly better with the +... but the + lost a fair deal of flexibility. I decided to go with the flexibility (which was vastly different between the two) instead of the slight difference in tone.
I also find no problems with the upper register on the PT50, but I didn't really do much upper register testing on the 50+ when I tried it. I would suggest you try a regular PT50 and compare it against the + to see if it fixes the problem.
I also find no problems with the upper register on the PT50, but I didn't really do much upper register testing on the 50+ when I tried it. I would suggest you try a regular PT50 and compare it against the + to see if it fixes the problem.
-
Onebaplayer
- bugler

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 1:16 am
- Location: San Jose, CA