PT-50 Take Some Getting Used To ?

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
tubeast
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 819
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:59 pm
Location: Buers, Austria

Post by tubeast »

Maybe you should just give it some more time.
It worked just fine for me, especially in high register.
Hans
Melton 46 S
1903 or earlier GLIER Helicon, customized Hermuth MP
2009 WILLSON 6400 RZ5, customized GEWA 52 + Wessex "Chief"
MW HoJo 2011 FA, Wessex "Chief"
smurphius
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:36 pm

Post by smurphius »

With work, you can improve anything over time, regardless of what mouthpiece you're using. That is a huge mouthpiece (I played one for 3 years) that does take some getting used to, but eventually I learned to love it.

Think about your air flow going through the mouthpiece and try to center it. If that isn't working right, it could be causing you some of the other problems you mentioned.

You'll definately be playing with a darker, big sound with that thing, I'm sure you've noticed. :)
MikeMason
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:03 am
Location: montgomery/gulf shores, Alabama
Contact:

Post by MikeMason »

I think of the 50+ as a large ensemble/orchestra mp for heavy rep.I've yet to need multiple tonguing in these situations,though i do have a very fast single tongue.I use other horns and mp's if i need to multiple tongue.The 50+ and my big holton make a sound that makes me smile on heavy tunes :D
Pensacola Symphony
Troy University-adjunct tuba instructor
Yamaha yfb621 with 16’’ bell,with blokepiece symphony
Eastman 6/4 with blokepiece symphony/profundo
User avatar
porkchopsisgood
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:55 am

Post by porkchopsisgood »

Great mouthpiece.....the PT-50 is the only CC mouthpiece I've used in the past 15 years....just switched to the PT-50+ two years ago and I'm in love with it.

Keep working at it....it'll pay off.
Allen V. Carter
Eastman 836
MW 2145
MW 45SLZ
XO Bass Bone

Thomas Maurice Booth
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 433
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 6:03 pm

Post by Thomas Maurice Booth »

The heavyness of the PT-50+ I found through my playing and experimenting was as said before good for some of the harder blows ie: Bruckner stuff, some Mahler, etc. However, with the regular PT-50, I got the same results in my sound but with a crisper and more consistent(in regards to clarity). Both are good mouthpieces, but I would exercise discretion as to what I use the PT-50+ for.
I post because you're unable to Google.
J Stowe
bugler
bugler
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:46 am
Location: Columbia, SC
Contact:

Post by J Stowe »

My lips are kinda small, so I've been playing on a 42, a recent switch from the 50. I hear that 42's and 44's work better for some people, so if you continue to have the same problems in the future, those might be helpful.
Go Dawgs!
Woo Pig!
Go Ducks!
quinterbourne
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 5:52 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by quinterbourne »

I have a PT50 (not a +) and I think it's great. I tried it beside a PT50+ and found that the sound was only very slightly better with the +... but the + lost a fair deal of flexibility. I decided to go with the flexibility (which was vastly different between the two) instead of the slight difference in tone.

I also find no problems with the upper register on the PT50, but I didn't really do much upper register testing on the 50+ when I tried it. I would suggest you try a regular PT50 and compare it against the + to see if it fixes the problem.
Onebaplayer
bugler
bugler
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 1:16 am
Location: San Jose, CA

Post by Onebaplayer »

Im still getting used to my PT50+. I love it already, but Im still not quite used to its size, probably more just me ironing out habits I developed playing on smaller mouthpieces in the low register.
Post Reply