hmmmmmmmmmStevie Wonder wrote:Lookin' back on when I, was a little nappy headed boy"

(Taken from http://mediamatters.org/items/200704040011)rascaljim wrote:I tried to locate the exact quote that I remember reading on Yahoo news a week ago and I can't find it anywhere, but I do recall feeling less offended when I read it. If anyone can find it it would be a nice addition to the thread.
This (understandably skeptical) tuba player thinks you will remain waiting and wanting for an apology...issues like this have a habit of evaporating from the public forum with no regrets from the provocateurs, IMO.rascaljim wrote:I also think it's interesting that the reverends Jackson and Sharpton are gettin death threats now. I heard last night that one of their buildings had to be evacuated because of a bomb threat. I think some people (rightly so) are getting a little fed up of the media circus that ensues anything those two decide to spout off about race. I'm still waiting to hear them apologize for their racist comments about the Duke Lacrosse players.
Travelman wrote:I agree that he can say what he wants...Yes, thank goodness, it IS a free country.
But it is also a "free" market system...and THAT will be the final judge on this thing. Either the public will stop watching and commercial sponsors will pull out...or he just takes his hand slap and gets back in the saddle (literally).
I wish all the best to the Rutgers players. From what I saw on their news conference today, they handled themselves with real class and dignity.
thank you for the linkbloke wrote:Al Sharpton may or may not have proper claim to the "right" to say whatever he wishes to say. His "free speech", in the past, has lead to deaths and the destruction of lives...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%2 ... gle+Search
Can Don Imus "free speech" compete with this impressive record?
Certainly, sports are the king, presently, in America. I don't believe the outcry by Jackson & Sharpton would have resonated as well had it been about the tuba section, however I also don't believe they would have passed over another opportunity to try to keep a wedge between the races going. This is what they do. It is profitable to them both financially and from a power standpoint. Without this MO, what would they have, or be?ken k wrote: Would there have been such a big outcry had it been Rutgers's tuba section that would have been insulted? I think the only reason it got the airplay it did was because it was about sports... which seem to rule the world.
How times change....bloke wrote:I believe there is a general consensus that their line of work is known as "poverty pimping", but - at least to me - Al Sharpton doesn't appear to be particularly "nappy-headed".TubaRay wrote:...however I also don't believe they would have passed over another opportunity to try to keep a wedge between the races going. This is what they do. It is profitable to them both financially and from a power standpoint. Without this MO, what would they have, or be?
chipster55 wrote:whateverBowerybum wrote:I care and have a life too. Anything's possible in America.chipster55 wrote:About Imus, Jesse Jackson & Sharpton - other than the media, does anyone really give a S#%&?? If so, get a life!!
Captain Sousie wrote:chipster55 wrote:whateverBowerybum wrote: I care and have a life too. Anything's possible in America.![]()
![]()
![]()
I suppose it would be too political to say that those who are not students of history are doomed to repeat it...so I won't.
Sou
Well i did not post this because it was about NOLA, but rather because our discussion in the thread commented on Sharpton and Jackson, etc. I thought this article was interesting in that the author, who is African-American, doesn't seem to like them and their entitlement stance either.bloke wrote:I dunno how this thread moved over to the topic of N.O. levees. I have a close relative who just retired from the Corps of Engineers. He told me the the levees had been breached an hour or two prior to all of you seeing it on the news. I called our local news station with all that I knew, but they were afraid to run the story for lack of verification.
We all know now that those levees, structurally, were b.s. (just bulldozed dirt - with virtually no reinforcement) and that those canals, structurally, were b.s. (canals were 3-piece concrete, rather than 1-piece concrete).
Still to this day, all of that remains basically the same - except for the specific parts that were breeched, destroyed, and rebuilt.
I'm not sure that many know this: The federal government, over the years, agreed to put X% $$$$$$$$$ into levee construction if the city and state put in X% $$$$$$. In other words, the federal philosophy has always been, "We'll get-r-done (however well you WANT it done), but YOU - the locals - must demonstrate to us at the federal level how much of a priority the levees are to YOU." The state/city contribution to levee construction has always been very small, so the federal portion, though geometrically greater, has always been inadequate. As many of us are quite familiar with the way the City of New Orleans (as well as many of our other cities) is run, we know that most of the local money collected for levee construction and reinforcement did not go towards levee construction and reinforcement.