Rick Denney wrote: I consider myself quite fortunate that what comes naturally to me turns out to be marketable, but after doing it for decades, it has lost a lot of that appeal. But it hasn't lost so much appeal that I'm willing to start over with something else. Some who are in their 20's would call that "selling out".
Some who are in their 60's might call it that, too.
My standard advice to students is: "Find out what you want to do 24/7. Then get good at it. If you are good enough, someone will pay you for it."
For older folk, the advice is: "Look at what you are actually doing 24/7. That *must* be what you want to do. If you disagree - see my standard advice to students."
A life spent doing what you love is often financially rocky, and often compromises must be made. But...a life spent chasing money doing something you don't care about is a tragedy. (note that it's not a tragedy if "chasing money" is what you love, and what you want to do 24/7. Greed is Good, too.)
And finally...my standard comment in threads like this one: if you are pursuing a COLLEGE MAJOR because you think it will automatically lead to a career in that field, then you are seriously mistaken.
Here's an acid test: my personal opinion is that you should pursue a college major if and only if you can see yourself being a lifetime AMATEUR in that field. For most college students, their college major is completely disconnected from their lifetime career. How many "historians" do you know?
This cuts both ways - if you are a college INSTRUCTOR and you believe you are training students for a career, please consider a change of profession.
Personally, I see very little point, and even less intellectual honesty, in a COLLEGE degree called "music performance". One might must as honestly offer degrees in "athletic performance", or "theatrical performance", or even, if truth be told, in "engineering performance".
I don't teach music. I teach something that many people consider to be more "career oriented". But, I spend an awful lot of my time fighting against courses I might call "computer science performance". These are the training courses that industry *claims* it wants new-hires to have taken (but, the smarter ones in industry know that they are wrong about that).
At the same time, I am constantly telling college sophomores that "if you are not writing 2 or three computer programs - FOR FUN - every week, then you should seriously re-think your choice of major."
I have (as usual) more to say...but I must leave for rehearsal...and then I need to spend some time on my Eb fingerings...