I agree with both sides of the arguement. If I had been required to purchase my own instrument I would probably have never started band. However I played most of MS and HS on an OLD tuba ( I think King no idea what model) that looked as though it had been drug behind a truck and leaked copious amount of air due to nonprofessional repair work (nearly irreversable). I think that a student can learn to play on ANY instrument as long as it plays. However I was ecstatic when my school obtained a St. Petersburg and didn't have any trouble with it getting beat up--the valves were another story--they stuck all the time. However a new band director traded the St. Petersburg for a 3/4 Jupiter ---which I HATED. I perfered the old king that leaked to it. I couldn't get much sound out of it. It might have been alright in MS but as a Jr/Sr in HS I felt very restricted.Ryan_Beucke wrote:Jay Bertolet wrote:Oh my. That strikes a nerve with me. Why does any high school student feel the entitlement to have quality equipment in their hands, provided free of charge? My encouragement: WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!! Having any equipment to use, free of charge, should be seen for the blessing that it is and not taken for granted. If you feel the need to have better equipment than that provided to you at no cost, GO OUT AND BUY YOUR OWN!!!hurricane_harry wrote:and lets face it, yea alot of high school players should be using a garbage can with a hole drilled for a mouthpiece, but there should always be a working quality horn locked up somewhere.
End of rant.
In all fairness, the equiptment is never free of charge. It's either payed for by the taxes the parents pay, or in the case of many schools including my High School, you have to pay a fee every year or summer that you use a horn. And if the students had to buy their own instruments, music education as we know it would pretty much cease to exist.
Amy