Finale question

The bulk of the musical talk
pierso20
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Finale question

Post by pierso20 »

Todd S. Malicoate wrote:
J.c. Sherman wrote:BTW: You can use unmeasured music in Finale... but it's a royal pain in the rump!
I couldn't disagree more. You simply put in the desired time signature of the "free" bar (17/4 or whatever it would be) and then hide it in the measure attributes. You can also easily do the dotted bar lines there. Piece of cake.

Finale 2011? No, thanks. I'll continue to stick with 2002 which quite literally does everything I need. Magnetic layout? No thanks, I'll move them myself.
Yep, I wrote a piece in free bar design. Which you can do the way you suggested, OR you could make the bar 1,000,000/4. :P

I use 2008 and just got an email about 2011...doesn't look any different than 2010...or 2009....or 2008. So no switch yet. I would CONSIDER switching when they come out with a magnetic layout...BUT knowing how software works, it'll be "glitchy" and probably cause more work than it fixes. It's not really that hard to just move the stuff as you go. :P
Brooke Pierson

Music Educator
Composer
Composer http://www.brookepierson.com" target="_blank" target="_blank" target="_blank
rocksanddirt
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 552
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:14 pm

Re: Finale question

Post by rocksanddirt »

phoenix wrote:
Torrents, gentlemen.

That is all.
Amen to that!
stealing is stealing. whether money from a bank, or software from a developer.
User avatar
J.c. Sherman
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2116
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Cleveland
Contact:

Re: Finale question

Post by J.c. Sherman »

Todd S. Malicoate wrote:
J.c. Sherman wrote:BTW: You can use unmeasured music in Finale... but it's a royal pain in the rump!
I couldn't disagree more. You simply put in the desired time signature of the "free" bar (17/4 or whatever it would be) and then hide it in the measure attributes. You can also easily do the dotted bar lines there. Piece of cake.

Finale 2011? No, thanks. I'll continue to stick with 2002 which quite literally does everything I need. Magnetic layout? No thanks, I'll move them myself.
Guess I'm easily irritated - that seams a pain to me... would rather hit the "don't put any bars in" button. Like mid-measure repeats should have a "put double bar here" button :-)

J.c.S.
Instructor of Tuba & Euphonium, Cleveland State University
Principal Tuba, Firelands Symphony Orchestra
President, Variations in Brass
http://www.jcsherman.net
pierso20
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Finale question

Post by pierso20 »

J.c. Sherman wrote:Guess I'm easily irritated - that seams a pain to me... would rather hit the "don't put any bars in" button. Like mid-measure repeats should have a "put double bar here" button :-)

J.c.S.
It's really not much of a pain. Even non-barred measures have some sort of semblance of meter, implied somehow. All you need to do is highlight all the measures, go to measure attributes, and select "hide barlines".
Like mid-measure repeats should have a "put double bar here" button :-)
Why would you even want to do this!!??? lol
Brooke Pierson

Music Educator
Composer
Composer http://www.brookepierson.com" target="_blank" target="_blank" target="_blank
User avatar
Todd S. Malicoate
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2378
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 11:12 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK

Re: Finale question

Post by Todd S. Malicoate »

J.c. Sherman wrote:Guess I'm easily irritated - that seams a pain to me... would rather hit the "don't put any bars in" button. Like mid-measure repeats should have a "put double bar here" button :-)
Agree to disagree, then, J.C. And no hard feelings.

One thing Finale (of any release year) DOES have is a nice forum in which to ask for help if you have a problem like described above and need a quick solution. Many folks check there quite often and you can receive reasonably quick help from very knowledgeable users of Finale. Look here.
User avatar
BVD Press
TubeNet Sponsor
TubeNet Sponsor
Posts: 1588
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 3:11 pm
Location: CT

Re: Finale question

Post by BVD Press »

sailn2ba
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 365
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:53 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: Finale question

Post by sailn2ba »

THANKS for the suggestions. . . including the forum links. I'll sharpen my goosequill (PrintMusic 2002) and proceed.
User avatar
bearphonium
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1077
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: Making mischief in the back row at 44, 1' 49"N, 123, 8'10"W

Re: Finale question

Post by bearphonium »

I have been fumbling around with PrintMusic 2007, and have been satisfied with what it does in the realm that I use it in: Hobbyist tuba player who transcribes BC/TC euph for the TC/BC euph part/player, or taking a hand written part and putting it on a printed piece of paper, or making woodwind quintets out of the brass music that I have and the like.

As I get deeper into doing some arrangements, however, I discover that most of my directors are using Sibelius rather than Finale, and our combined ineptness on the computer prohibits my stuff from being read by them. People that I know and respect have suggested Finale as a superior program, but they are way more involved and invested in this than I. I don't see me doing anything on the even approaching professional level with this, and I am considering moving to Sibelius. When I do, I will add more to this thread, if it is even pertinent at that point.

Ally"stumbling along"House
Mirafone 186 BBb
VMI 201 3/4 BBb
King Sousaphone
Conn 19I 4-valve non-comp Euph


What Would Xena Do?
Post Reply