Mack 410 CC tuba Comparison

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
thetubawizard
bugler
bugler
Posts: 100
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 9:44 pm

Mack 410 CC tuba Comparison

Post by thetubawizard »

Okay, so I'm really thinking about buying a Mack Brass 410 CC tuba soon but I have a question that has been driving me crazy. Every one says it compares to the Miraphone 186 but the Mack Brass 410 looks just like the Miraphone 188 model to me... So, here is my question, does it have the body style of the 188 and just play like the 186 or is it something else (or am I just crazy)?
Nick
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Eastman 632
User avatar
bisontuba
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 4320
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 8:55 am
Location: Bottom of Lake Erie

Re: Mack 410 CC tuba Comparison

Post by bisontuba »

186 CC clone...
Mark
thetubawizard
bugler
bugler
Posts: 100
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 9:44 pm

Re: Mack 410 CC tuba Comparison

Post by thetubawizard »

Okay thank! I guess just seeing the wrap makes me want to think of the 188.
Nick
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Eastman 632
MikeMason
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:03 am
Location: montgomery/gulf shores, Alabama
Contact:

Re: Mack 410 CC tuba Comparison

Post by MikeMason »

Keep in mind the big difference between old and new style 186.much larger bell on new.changed mid '80s I think.clone is of the new
Pensacola Symphony
Troy University-adjunct tuba instructor
Yamaha yfb621 with 16’’ bell,with blokepiece symphony
Eastman 6/4 with blokepiece symphony/profundo
UDELBR
Deletedaccounts
Deletedaccounts
Posts: 1567
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:07 am

Re: Mack 410 CC tuba Comparison

Post by UDELBR »

To me, it definitely plays heavier than a 186. Maybe thicker metal or heavier bracing.
MikeMason
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:03 am
Location: montgomery/gulf shores, Alabama
Contact:

Re: Mack 410 CC tuba Comparison

Post by MikeMason »

Not built as well or with as good of mechanics,but play as well or better for me.my opinion.
Pensacola Symphony
Troy University-adjunct tuba instructor
Yamaha yfb621 with 16’’ bell,with blokepiece symphony
Eastman 6/4 with blokepiece symphony/profundo
Michael Bush
FAQ Czar
Posts: 2338
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 2:54 pm

Re: Mack 410 CC tuba Comparison

Post by Michael Bush »

186.

Fit and finish has been an issue in the past, but that is improving.

Is it a $6200-price-difference issue? Nope.

I keep thinking of selling mine, but keep losing interest in that. It's hard to imagine where you could get more bang for the buck.
fkin
bugler
bugler
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:32 pm

Re: Mack 410 CC tuba Comparison

Post by fkin »

Hi, forum,

i ve been thinking of buying the 410CC tuba directly from the jinbao factory. but i am still considering. i own a large BBb 4 rotors Jinbao tuba. at first i like it a lot. it plays great when i practice at home. but once i take it to a concert band, with 3 other yamaha 321 big tuba near me, i can hear the difference . both me and my bandmates found it sounds stuffy. but if there were only me (i mean only 1 jinbao tuba in the band) then it blends quite well with the others. so i ve been hesitating buying the jinbao big CC.

can someone here with a mack or wessex 186 clone share your views? thx!

Kin
MikeMason
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:03 am
Location: montgomery/gulf shores, Alabama
Contact:

Re: Mack 410 CC tuba Comparison

Post by MikeMason »

321<miraclone.imho
Pensacola Symphony
Troy University-adjunct tuba instructor
Yamaha yfb621 with 16’’ bell,with blokepiece symphony
Eastman 6/4 with blokepiece symphony/profundo
User avatar
MartyNeilan
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 4878
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:06 am
Location: Practicing counting rests.

Re: Mack 410 CC tuba Comparison

Post by MartyNeilan »

UncleBeer wrote:To me, it definitely plays heavier than a 186. Maybe thicker metal or heavier bracing.
definitely. (at least on the early one I had)
UDELBR
Deletedaccounts
Deletedaccounts
Posts: 1567
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:07 am

Re: Mack 410 CC tuba Comparison

Post by UDELBR »

MartyNeilan wrote:
UncleBeer wrote:To me, it definitely plays heavier than a 186. Maybe thicker metal or heavier bracing.
definitely. (at least on the early one I had)
Mine was purchased about 6 months ago from Tom, so they're still that way.
ouch
bugler
bugler
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 11:13 pm
Location: Vancouver, Wash.

Re: Mack 410 CC tuba Comparison

Post by ouch »

The 410 has stupid good intonation though, so it's a gamble you can't lose!
Alex Stemson

Miraphone 1291 CC
Besson 983 Eb

Angry At Percussionists
UDELBR
Deletedaccounts
Deletedaccounts
Posts: 1567
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:07 am

Re: Mack 410 CC tuba Comparison

Post by UDELBR »

Plus, with Tom's price and his 7 day return policy, it's hard to go wrong there. (I'm obviously a satisfied customer, but not a shill).
Post Reply