I see a lot of F tubas nowadays with 19-22mm bore. Is this becoming rather an industry standard and what is the effect of bore size (both large and small) on a horn, in your experience...
Ta
Builders, tinkerers - Bore selection
- Peach
- 4 valves

- Posts: 701
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:42 am
- Location: London, UK
- Dan Schultz
- TubaTinker

- Posts: 10429
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
- Location: Newburgh, Indiana
- Contact:
Re: Builders, tinkerers - Bore selection
Seems to me that the bore size is being driven by the marketing folks who think that's what we want. The truth is that a big bore on a horn that does not have tapers designed for it is pretty useless. It's a matter of the horn being efficient. Remember the days when all makers would do is slap a bigger bell on horns?
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
- Donn
- 6 valves

- Posts: 5977
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Seattle, ☯
Re: Builders, tinkerers - Bore selection
Are mouthpiece receivers generally the same internal diameter, irrespective of the "bore" measurement at the valves? I wonder if the larger bore is actually because they want a certain taper all the way along the leadpipe, from that fixed starting point?